TonyHart
|
Beautiful Bacteria?
Thursday, March 23, 2006 11:09 PM
|
CallMeEleanor
|
It's a vag.
Thursday, March 23, 2006 11:34 PM
|
razmatazz9
|
I thought that was epithelial tissue. Bacteria? Psshh...
[Edited by razmatazz9 on 3/23/2006 1:38:44 PM. Reason for edit: /]
Thursday, March 23, 2006 11:38 PM
|
HairyBearChaos
|
yeah i was thinking the same thing sarah
simple squamous epithelium?
Friday, March 24, 2006 3:16 AM
|
HairyBearChaos
|
well actually if it's the vag, then it'd be nonkeratinised stratified squamous epithelium but it kind of looks like simple columnar epithelium.
depends on the exact location. :\
Friday, March 24, 2006 3:38 AM
|
niggy
|
So i cant see the number........am i color blind?
Friday, March 24, 2006 3:41 AM
|
DamnSkippy
|
It's a boat...right?...a boat...damn you magic eye!
Friday, March 24, 2006 4:13 AM
|
BoSox84
Brandon, FL
|
Holy shit, I forgot all about that book.
Friday, March 24, 2006 4:13 AM
|
Brugger
|
Eosinophilic for sure...
I see what appears to be some basophils (upper right hand corner)?
Perhaps some kind of secretory tissue...
They almost look like Islets of Langerhan (sp?).
Friday, March 24, 2006 4:42 AM
|
HairyBearChaos
|
it's a kind of confusing picture
Friday, March 24, 2006 4:48 AM
|
Brugger
|
you have a few things going on.
There appears to be simple squamous (not epithelium).
You have some columnar vessels going on. I don't see RBCs so i don't think they are blood vessels...
I would say kidney, but there are no glomeruli taht i can recognize.
Maybe this is a pathological slide. Pathologists usually have to be told where the biopsy was taken so that they can determine if it's "normal" tissue or not. Some things are obvious, and other times they are not...
Friday, March 24, 2006 4:57 AM
|
HairyBearChaos
|
o shi i got told
Friday, March 24, 2006 5:01 AM
|
Brugger
|
do tell
Friday, March 24, 2006 6:44 AM
|
Brugger
|
bump until someone tells me what this is...
for real.
No ignorant answers.
Friday, March 24, 2006 11:43 PM
|
niggy
|
its an ameba under an electron micro-scope
Friday, March 24, 2006 11:44 PM
|
WRX STiStyle
|
looks like simple squamos columnar cells to me.
Friday, March 24, 2006 11:46 PM
|
niggy
|
^it could be that under a microscope
Friday, March 24, 2006 11:47 PM
|
Brugger
|
Niggy: If it was an electron microscope image, it would be black and white.
Wrxer: Simple squamous culumnar are two terms smushed together...
Niggy: Sublingual gland (all jacked up of course)?
Still i don't have an answer to the histo. slide.
Saturday, March 25, 2006 7:28 PM
|
CallMeEleanor
|
Way to over douche my picture. I love dyed slides of organs...it's an aesthetic thing. I had an interest in anatomy in high school. I never persued it because I'm an idiot. And the picture is......
I'll let you guys play with it a bit more.
but hey, here's a duodenum.
[Edited by CallMeEleanor on 3/25/2006 10:49:16 AM. Reason for edit: duodenums are the best]
Saturday, March 25, 2006 8:42 PM
|
HairyBearChaos
|
why don't you fully explain what it is?
or you don't know what it is?
Saturday, March 25, 2006 8:59 PM
|
Brugger
|
i like the assending colon on cross section a bit more...
the crypts look like daisies.
Still looking for an answer: BUMP
Saturday, March 25, 2006 9:48 PM
|
CallMeEleanor
|
I know it. But I mean...
Use your context clues.
Out of any organ, why would I pick this one? It's not a vag.
Don't check the properties, cheaters.
[Edited by CallMeEleanor on 3/25/2006 12:26:44 PM. Reason for edit: CHEATS]
Saturday, March 25, 2006 10:24 PM
|
Brugger
|
it just dawned on me what that is...
Quite obvious now that i think about it.......
Lets do this again sometime.
Sunday, March 26, 2006 7:38 PM
|
