CallMeEleanor
|
LOL @ gawking young, small family with stroller.
Wednesday, May 24, 2006 8:28 AM
|
TrackStar
|
yea, there were some horny old men tripping on themselves as well... 
Wednesday, May 24, 2006 8:39 AM
|
burnsinat0r
|
He's a professional photog that shoots uber celebritires and he doesn't even have an slr?
Wednesday, May 24, 2006 8:53 AM
|
JossaLION
|
It's the intrigued husband, the disapproving wife, and the oblivious child. hah.
Wednesday, May 24, 2006 8:58 AM
|
timeconsumerx
|
that looks like my parents camera. in brooklyn.
Wednesday, May 24, 2006 11:57 AM
|
TrackStar
|
quote :
burnsinat0r
78 Photos
He's a professional photog that shoots uber celebritires and he doesn't even have an slr?
[ Delete] 5/23/2006 10:53:59 PM |
I didn't claim this guy was anything. Keep in mind the number of photographers she has sworked with is more than 2... an lower than a million. And what is an SLR? I'm no camera expert.
Wednesday, May 24, 2006 6:45 PM
|
Meems
|
SLR means single-lens reflex camera.
It pretty much means that there's a mirror inside that reflects the image straight from what the lens sees, instead of looking through just a little window on the side of the camera. This way you shoot exactly what's in the lens' view. A non-SLR camera has an angle of about 20 degrees between what you're seeing through the viewfinder and what the camera is actually going to shoot. IMO real photographers, or at least serious ones, wouldn't be shooting with anything but an SLR.
Wednesday, May 24, 2006 7:22 PM
|
TrackStar
|
so how do you know that his camera doesn't have an SLR?
Wednesday, May 24, 2006 7:30 PM
|
xcalmxfuryx
|
^because of the way the camera is built. It's shape is highly atypical of an SLR camera.
Wednesday, May 24, 2006 9:00 PM
|
Sandman
|
Heheh.
I was just going to say that this looked like some dude taking a picture of some chick. I didn't know that "photo shoot" was such a blanket statement.
Wednesday, May 24, 2006 10:21 PM
|
xcalmxfuryx
|
So what, then, does a "photo shoot" imply?
Wednesday, May 24, 2006 10:27 PM
|
TrackStar
|
I'm pretty sure his camera was of high quality, it had alot of shit on it on closer inspection. And I think it was a 12 mega pixel camera also, 12 or 8, somthn like that. Whatever...
And yea... photo shoot? who does those things...
Thursday, May 25, 2006 4:01 AM
|
TrackStar
|
it is in NY man... you can even see the brooklyn bridge... and somthn that looks like a big bad river/bay... When is the last time you saw project housing on water front? But neway, its the port... thats what port buildings look like.
Thursday, May 25, 2006 11:12 AM
|
burnsinat0r
|
quote :
I didn't claim this guy was anything. |
quote :
Incognito
27 Photos
Yah, my buddy Tony (the photog) does a lot of celebrity photography in NYC. |
[quote]
Thursday, May 25, 2006 11:59 AM
|
Qacer
|
That camera looks like a Sony Cybershot F505. My dad has one of those.
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/sonydscf505/
Thursday, May 25, 2006 5:23 PM
|
SaNToRoGT
|
People care too much about something so stupid....
Thursday, May 25, 2006 6:50 PM
|
TrackStar
|
^.
quote :
burnsinat0r
78 Photos
quote :
I didn't claim this guy was anything.
quote :
Incognito
27 Photos
Yah, my buddy Tony (the photog) does a lot of celebrity photography in NYC.
[ Delete] 5/25/2006 1:59:31 AM |
lol, and who said his name was tony? But anyway, yea, he does do celeb photog, I seen his pictures and he pretty much has shot everyone. And somthn I didn't say before, I've noticed that alot of photographers that are good are capable of useing all sorts of different cameras from low to high quality. I read an article once about one famous photographer (shot scenery) who uses a shitty digital camera for all of his pictures.
[Edited by TrackStar on 5/25/2006 9:19:14 AM. Reason for edit: []
Thursday, May 25, 2006 6:58 PM
|
SaNToRoGT
|
Burns is a douche bag anyways. Who gives a fuck what he thinks...
Thursday, May 25, 2006 7:23 PM
|
burnsinat0r
|
Santoro: You know random info about cleaning like a housewife, I know information about being a photographer.
quote :
And somthn I didn't say before, I've noticed that alot of photographers that are good are capable of useing all sorts of different cameras from low to high quality. |
That'd be fine and dandy if he took good photos with his shitty camera. He doesn't even know how to expose properly.
Thursday, May 25, 2006 10:56 PM
|
TrackStar
|
^^You base that off of one image that she threw on this site not because it was good photography but because she liked the way she looked? There are plenty of images from that set that have nothing wrong with them.
I've asked this before, do you ever take imperfect pictures?
Friday, May 26, 2006 3:58 AM
|
burnsinat0r
|
There's 5 shots from that day in her gallery. All of them poorly exposed. I based that judgment of the 5 photos and the fact that he looks unprofessional.
Of course Ive taken imperfect pictures. I make sure to only provide the good ones to models.
[Edited by burnsinat0r on 5/25/2006 11:35:04 PM. Reason for edit: .:.]
Friday, May 26, 2006 9:32 AM
|
SaNToRoGT
|
But why do you care so much? If the guy's work is selling then it's selling. Don't hate...
Friday, May 26, 2006 9:52 AM
|
TrackStar
|
His teacher told him so. And how can you "look" unprofesional? As for which pictures we get, we get em all cause thats what we want.
Friday, May 26, 2006 10:16 AM
|
burnsinat0r
|
I'm self taught. Havent had a class or teacher yet.
I don't care that much. Just addressing that Nick thinks all of these photographers are big time celebrity photographers and there are no pictures to back it up.
btw...using a digi cam with on camera flash makes you look unprofessional.
Friday, May 26, 2006 1:18 PM
|
TrackStar
|
theres definitly a flash on that thing...
And this guy does work with celebs, but I never even pointed it out untill you brought it up. I haven't claimed all of her pictures are by high talent celeb photogs either.
Quit being an ignorant sounding douchebag, lots of accusations, lots of assumptions and you keep striking out.
Friday, May 26, 2006 5:43 PM
|
asleeponatrain
|
quote :
Quit being an ignorant sounding douchebag. |
That's news to me.
Friday, May 26, 2006 7:09 PM
|
blahblahblah
|
quote :
and you keep striking out. |
I think all his accusations have been pretty well backed up with facts or first-hand knowledge (jmo)
[Edited by blahblahblah on 5/26/2006 9:27:02 AM. Reason for edit: .]
Friday, May 26, 2006 7:26 PM
|
burnsinat0r
|
quote :
theres definitly a flash on that thing... |
Yes I know. Hence me saying he was using ON CAMERA flash. No decent photog uses on camera flash. Trust me, I know what Im talking about and you don't.
Anyways, If you want to check out where these 'accusations' are coming from, go back and read the SG thread.
Friday, May 26, 2006 11:56 PM
|
MTECougar2002
|
I use a camera daily over here in the desert that cost 15,000 and comes with a laptop and all sorts of crazy gadgets, lenses etc. I take pictures of junk. I know nothing of cameras. Military budget. yay.
Saturday, May 27, 2006 12:03 AM
|
TrackStar
|
^^That thread was full of much of the same thing, we've been through this there as well.
Saturday, May 27, 2006 12:20 AM
|
